Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Shooting Infrared with a Sony Nex-7 Part-2

20mm f/11 1/200 ISO 100.  Processed into black & white using Nik Sliver Efex Pro 2
 


A couple days ago I shared my initial experience shooting IR with the Sony Nex-7 and spoke briefly on the processing aspect of the files.
 
20mm f/11 1/200 ISO 100.  Processed into black & white using Nik Sliver Efex Pro 2
 
The samples included here were all shot mid to late morning May 10th in Rhyolite Ghost Town, Nevada.  I've been here several times however this was the first shooting IR.  I came here with no clear objective or certain outcome in mind.  As I shot the old buildings I saw in my mind that most would look better as black & white although a couple held a surprise for me.
 
20mm f/8 1/125 ISO 100 This files just looks better if kept in "false" color
 
The next 3-samples are the same file showing 3-different views.  The first is what the RAW file processed only using Sony's Image Data Converter.  The second sample is with a false-color action applied and the last has been converted using Nik Silver Efex Pro 2.  The image was captured using the Sony 20mm pancake lens at f/11 1/125 with the ISO 100.
 
 
 
 
At the end of what I consider the main street sits the only structure that looks to be intact.  This building sits behind a tall chain-link fence with warning signs posted.  The more I saw this building the more I wanted to do something unusual thus the next 3-samples.  The image was captured using the Sony 20mm pancake lens at f/11 1/125 with the ISO 100.  The file was first rendered in Sony Image Data Converter before opening in CS6 where I used a false-color action before opening Nik HDR Efex Pro and processing to taste.
 
But first the sign...
 
 
 
 
 
 
I'm willing to share more IR thoughts should there be interest.
 
Don


 


Saturday, May 18, 2013

Shooting Infrared with a Sony Nex-7

 
Garrapata State Park, Carmel California
18-55mm lens 18mm (27mm) 
f/11 1/125 ISO 100
 
This will turn out to be a multi-part conversation regarding shooting infrared (IR) images with a Sony Nex-7.  On April 11th I gave a teaser about the subject; on May 3rd I gave some brief samples of the images captured shortly after I got the camera back from Life Pixel.  Now, I go a little more in depth on the subject of shooting IR with the Sony Nex-7 along with the processing of the files.  The good, the bad and the ugly.

Garrapata State Park, Carmel California
18-55mm lens 18mm (27mm)
f/11 1/125 ISO 100
 
 

Bixby Bridge, Big Sur California
As shot, converted to black & white and Color conversion
20mm (30mm) f/11 1/80 ISO 100
 
When I first began looking at the Nex-7 as a candidate for conversion I found little written about it.  The most information I found was located on the various websites that offer the conversion services.  So far to date I've not found one instance of anyone writing about their experience. 
 
Julia Pfeiffer Burns State Park, Big Sur California
20mm (30mm) f/16 0.6 seconds ISO 100
Yes, you can "smoke water in IR
 
I highly recommend a visit to Life Pixels website as you'll find a wealth of information on the various filter choices, camera choices as well as sample of images and tutorials that include a multipage eBook "Digital Infrared Photography Primer" found here.  I figure why reinvent the wheel when the kind folks at Life Pixel already has one rolling?  You'll find much more information here than what I can hope to offer so go visit the site.  
 
A word about Life Pixel.  I am not associated with the company, nor was I asked to indorse them in anyway.  I feel that when you find a great company to do business with it's beneficial to spread the word.  After all I want them to continue providing the great service for years to come.
 
Garrapata State Park, Carmel California
18-55mm lens 50mm (75mm)
f/16 1/100 ISO 100
 
As written earlier, I choose to convert the Nex-7 the same as I did the 1DsII; using an "Enhanced Color Infrared Filter".  This filter transmits more of the visible red and is similar to a Wratten 70 gelatin filter.   Since it passes more visible red light the IR images have more color in them; more color in the sky as well as foliage.  The files can also be processed in Photoshop to produce a pleasing end result.
 
There's a problem though.  First, the filter is slightly darker thus the view from the LCD and Viewfinder is darker, much darker.  The best I can describe it is that it's like looking at the LCD through a pair of sunglasses.  I've got a friend who shoots infrared using a 720 filter which is brighter.  He keeps the camera in "P" mode and gets excellent results.  I tried that and quickly found it doesn't work for me and went back to the way I normally shoot which is "M" (manual).  I found by shooting manual I can see the scene clear enough in bright sunlight using either the Viewfinder or LCD.  All the images included here were shot in manual mode.
 
 
Same image from Tucson, Arizona
first converted to black & white the second converted to color
20mm (30mm) f/8 1/500 ISO 100
 

Okay there's another problem.  I figured to get rid of the bad first.  Photoshop and by extension Camera Raw can not properly process any infrared image which has a White Balance set for IR.  All's not lost.  If you use a Nikon or Cannon you simply use the software that came with the camera to open the file and then save as a Tiff.  The same holds true with Sony.  Sony has a program they call "Image Data Converter".  That's the good news.  The bad news is that it doesn't support 64bit which is what I have on my computer.  There's a work around.  I open the program and save 2-files to Tiff then close it down before it stalls and quits.  Then I open it again and do 2-more.  It sucks but until Sony gets around to supporting 64bit I'm stuck with this type of workflow.  One other thought before I end this portion.  I shoot RAW files as there's so much more information included than with a Jpeg.  Please, if you're going to shoot IR do yourself the favor of using the best possible capture you have available and shoot RAW.
 

RAW file as seen in Photoshop
 
Same file as seen in Sony Image Data Converter
 
Image seen after opening in Photoshop and converting to color
20mm (30mm) f/8 1/640 ISO 100
 
A typical file when opened in CS6 is 6171x4114 pixels (17x11) at 360 dpi resolution and 16 bit.  We're talking enough information/resolution to print almost any size you want.  This file as an example (DSC0030) as shot was 23.88 MB; once converted to a Tiff the size is now 145.29 MB before any further processing is done.  Using a false color action the file is now 290.57MB.
 
Entering Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/16 1/100 ISO100
Converted to black & white and cropped to suit
 
Lenses used:  The Nex7 came with what appears to be a good 18-55 "kit lens".  Normally I shy away from using any kit lens as they are routinely not the "best".  I did however use it on this outing; primarily to see what it would produce and to get a better feel for the camera.  I ordered the new Sony 20mm pancake while the conversion was taking place.  My thoughts were that it would make for an even smaller footprint (which it does) and with the crop factor of 1.5 it would keep me close at 30mm of what my widest lens on the Cambo and Phase One DF is.  (I've included the 35mm focal length as follows 20mm (30mm) or 18-55mm lens 18mm (27mm)).
 
Along the to Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/11 1/125 ISO100
Color conversion, cropped to suit
 
Mesquite Sand Dunes, Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/16 1/125 ISO 100
Color conversion, cropped to suit
 
Death Valley, California
20mm (30mm) f/8 1/125 ISO 100
Color conversion, cropped to suit

As an end note to this section; I liked the way the Nex7 handled so well that I've since ordered another one to keep as a color camera.  Additionally I've ordered the newly released Zeiss 12mm and 32mm lenses to be used on either camera body.
 
20 Mule Team Canyon, Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/9 1/160 ISO 100
  

20 Mule Team Canyon, Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/9 1/160 ISO 100
I decided I liked the coler better
 
I think I've included enough sample images to prove that the Sony Nex-7 is a great candidate for infrared conversion and with just a little bit of extra work you'll get great images either as they are, color converted or black & white.
 
Zabrisike Point, Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/11 1/200 ISO 100
 
There's going to be more to this so stay tuned.  If you have any questions, comments or suggestion please feel free to contact me.

Furnace Creek Ranch, Death Valley California
20mm (30mm) f/8 1/160 ISO 100
 
 
 
Don

 

 


 
 
 
 


Friday, May 3, 2013

Sony NEX-7 Infrared



The Sony was returned yesterday after undergoing surgery at Life Pixels.  I bought the little NEX-7 for the sole purpose of converting it to shoot infrared in the 665nm range.  I choose to go in the 665nm range as that's what I had another camera converted to and was pleased with the files.  The 665nm blocks wavelengths shorter than 665nm allowing those longer than 665nm to pass through.  This conversion is well suited for color infrared photography due to its broader transmittance properties. Color is more saturated; black and white while possible might not be as dramatic as the 715nm filter.



The camera:

One of the smallest (it fits in the palm of your hand) 24.3 megapixel (native print size at 360dpi is 16.667x11.111) with an APS-C sensor amounting to a 1.5 crop factor for 35mm.  The camera came with a 18-55mm lens (comparable to 27-82.5mm 35mm focal length).  The camera by itself weights in at 10.3 oz (292 g).  The thing is small but carries a huge punch.
 
 
I wanted a smaller format lens than the kit lens and opted for the new Sony 20mm f/2.8 which is approximately 1.5 inches long.  The 20mm is comparable to 30mm in a 35mm format.  In checking focal lengths of my medium format I found the 40mm I use on my Cambo WRS tech cam is comparable to a 25mm while the 55mm lens on my Phase One DF body is 34mm.  I see this lens fitting right in; and it can fit in my pocket!
The weather in Tucson has made a turn for the worse with red flag warnings and visibility less than 10 miles.  The sky (if you can see it) is dull with blowing sand/dust/dirt/crap.  Not a great time to test/get used to a new camera.  So what do you when?  Shoot close up.
 
 
There are four-samples of the same image included here.  The first image shows the file directly out of the camera.  Number-two shows the same image with just a touch of contrast added (added to taste).  Number-three shows the effect of an old infrared action I used with my older camera (and still works with the NEX-7).  The fourth-file shows the result of processing Number-three through NIK Silver-Efex Pro2.
I've got a trip to California next week where I'll end up shooting this along Big Sur before heading to Death Valley on the way home.  I'll be sharing more information/images as I get use to the camera. 
  
Don